by Cole Herrold
Very rarely in Cryptid encounters do we
have a witness who encounters a cryptid multiple times; however, Du Wenlian, a
tour guide of the Changbai mountains, would encounter this avian anomaly twice
in the year 2009. She first encountered the bizarre bird in late July of 2009;
while out, she noticed a light-yellow bird beating its wings slightly near the
road that she was traveling along close to Yuehualin. Only a month after her
initial sighting, Du would encounter a smaller specimen in August of 2009. This
sighting which occurred almost two miles from her initial one, gave her more
insight into this creature's locomotion; even though the creature was much
smaller than her first, she noticed that the way the bird would propel itself
through the air was not unlike that of a butterfly in motion as the wings both
on the front and back would lift up together and drop to aid in propulsion.
Interestingly while those are the only
English translated mass reiterated accounts of the Siyiniao there is a similar
creature whose appearance is almost identical. This creature known as the Xiao
is a four-winged bird which had a doglike tail and as if the appearance
couldn’t get any more bizarre a single eye. The creature much like the Siyiniao
is compared to a magpie in vocalization and in a lesser extent appearance.
Allegedly the creature when eaten has some gastronomical healing ability as
eating its flesh can cure both abdominal pain and diarrhea. Now there is a very
good chance that what the Xiao is, is a regional variation of the Siyiniao in
fact aside from the four wings the dog like tail could be a reference to the
inverted trapezoid style tail that some reports of the Siyiniao is said to have
and in fact some ancient Chinese art do seem to solidify this appearance.
While specific sightings of this bird are slim and
practically nonexistent in American media, especially the most interesting
aspect of this creature is not the sightings since most are as mundane as a
natural sighting of normal fauna, but it's the bizarre appearance that does not
match to anything we currently know exists today. This creature, much like the
flashlight frog or Mongolian death worm, is a cryptid that if you were to
encounter it in the wild, you probably would not recognize it as a new species
even with its unique second wing structure, which to the untrained eye could be
chalked up to a kind of plumage display as seen with the bird of paradise and
their ilk. Yet, for those biologists and researchers who know that a
four-winged bird is an incredible find, it is something that could change
science forever if found.
While the bizarre appearance is if accurate
revolutionary, it does add to the mystery, for no known species matches the
appearance of the Siyiniao. This, as with all cryptid sightings, raises the
question of what it could be. Starting off skeptically, the identity of the
Siyiniao might be that of the Standard-Winged Nightjar. The Standard Winged
Nightjar is a nocturnal species of bird found in Africa. This bird during
breeding season is known to generate a bizarre wing attachment that features a
broad central flight feather that can be found on each wing. These attachments
can reach a foot in length, and the bizarre appearance of this feature, as
hypothesized in the book Mystery Creatures of China, might potentially
be misinterpreted as an additional set of wings. The problem with this
hypothesis, however, is that the Standard Winged Nightjar is found primarily in
the area from Senegal to Ethiopia in Africa, which is a far gap from the
reported sightings of the Siyiniao in China. A step up from the Standard Winged
Nightjar hypothesis is the idea that potentially what is seen in a Chinese
nightjar as yet unidentified that also has these mating season features. This
would still be a cryptid and something to consider; however, if we are to take
sightings of this animal at face value, the wings are clearly segmented and
attached to the body and not some additional feature protruding from already
established features.
The next most plausible idea is that this is a bird
that somehow, through evolution, managed to evolve two sets of wings. This is
accurate is an extremely interesting possibility, for it's something that we
have not seen in nature. Wings are essentially super-modified hands and arms
adapted from previous ancestors' features. If a bird developed two sets of
wings, that would imply that it would have two sets of arm bones and phalanges.
Now there is also the possibility that what is being seen is not a true wing as
I've described but a feathered structure that aids in flight or gliding, so
this secondary structure would then be not a true wing. However, going off of
the reports, primarily those of Du Wenlian in 2009, where she described the
wings as functioning like those of a butterfly, it would seem that this is
probably not the case, and instead, we are seeing truly functional wings.
The next possibility which I mentioned earlier is that
what this creature is, is that it is a relict that somehow managed to survive
mass extinction. The Microraptor did have four wings, the second pair
being connected to the animal's feet that were covered in plumage that does
seem to indicate some flight capacity. The creature also had a long slender
feathery tail which is similar to what locals told Liu Jianfeng that the
Siyiniao's tail is supposed to look like. The Microraptor lived in the early
Cretaceous period, and interestingly enough, fossils have been found near the
Changbai Mountains in the province of Liaoning. Now while this seems to be a
dead ringer for what the Siyiniao could be, there are some features that could
point to it being something else entirely. The obvious problem is that the
Microraptor has been believed to be extinct for millions of years, and
while this creature is more plausible to of survived the mass extinction due to
its small size, we still have no official find in the fossil record confirming
its existence past the Cretaceous period. The next major issue is that when
comparing the 2009 sightings with its appearance, there are some features that
seem to point to another creature entirely. The bird seen in the 1990s was
described as having a tail like an inverted trapezoid. This inverted trapezoid
is more finch or bird of prey like which is entirely different from the long
slender tail, which is more like a feathered reptile as seen in the Microraptor
fossils. Another feature, even though it's a minor difference as far as we can
tell in the fossil record, is the report of the beak in the 90s and microraptor's
fossil. Many researchers believe that many dinosaurs did have a kind of beak
and many that we have discovered do, but as far as we can tell, Microraptor did
not, even though most paleontology-oriented artwork does depict them as having
a beak similar to a robin or another finch-like bird.
The wings of the Microraptor also, as stated and their
functionality as compared to the Siyiniao is another possible difference that
could hint at something else. Microraptor's wings are connected to both
hands and arms, legs, and feet. The Siyiniao is not ever specified as to
whether the bird has an additional set of legs or if it is simply the two sets
of wings. If it is the former and not the latter, there is the chance that what
we are truly talking about is a six-limbed creature and not a four-limbed
creature with both pairs being specialized for flight. From the research, I've
found this element is ambiguous and something we do need to keep in mind for
this additional pair of limbs can totally put a monkey's wrench into the works
of attempting to figure out what this creature could be. Assuming it is four
wings only and a feature akin to Microraptor, the locomotion in flight
is something that does need to be debated on for since all we have to go on
with microraptor's behavior is a pile of bones, so how it truly moved is
almost impossible to verify we can come close for sure when comparing the
movements of known species but to be 100% sure this is how it moved is a slim
chance. In fact, there are some researchers who don't believe the Microraptor
could fly like a bird but could only glide, and if that's the case, then it
would be very different from the Siyiniao, which seems to be very much adapted
to the ability to fly even though the only true description we have to its
propulsion is that it flew like a butterfly which is very stereotypic when one
thinks of a four-winged flying creature.
While the Microraptor hypothesis has its flaws,
there is the possibility that it might not be too far off. There is the
possibility a small relict population did survive and proceeded to evolve into
an even more bird-like creature and managed to keep the four-winged feature
still and adapted it to be more suited for flying than its previous ancestors.
The geographic area for such an evolution is perfect and much more plausible
than a lot of other cryptid sightings of similar creatures or other saurians in
areas where fossils were not found of the creature they are said to represent. Sure, this is only conjectured as with most
cases when attempting to rationalize the unexplained, but it is not so
farfetched. Whales, for example, still have pelvic bones. They are a vestigial
structure that they no longer need, but due to issues with losing the feature,
they continue to have it as a reminder of a time when their ancestors walked on
land. We could be seeing something similar here except that this feature is
more of a help evolutionarily than a hindrance leading to a more complex
feature.
No comments:
Post a Comment